

The latest and the greatest........
Article for the Newsletter for the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Lebendige Gemeinde München
(Vol 2022-2, pp15-17, July 2022)
Division and Polarisation, social dynamite or drivers of progress?
by Dr. Elisabeth Brandt
For years, politicians and social scientists have been warning against society’s fragmentation. Yet fragmentation is a misnomer, better to speak of polarisation. After all, only few groups, as for example religious minorities or civil organisations like the Reichsbürger, consciously split off from their fellow citizens. These groups respect neither our police, our constitution nor our government and organise themselves in parallel societies. Polarisation at the other hand is an important driver of social progress. This is why Jesus Christ speaks: "Do you think that I have come to give peace on earth? No, I tell you, but rather division."(Lukas 12,51). We equate societies to communities and expect social harmony, a misconception as communities define themselves through their shared values whereas societies are made of separate collectives with diverging values and agendas. North Korea provides a sobering example for a society whose members are forced into affected uniformity with dire consequences or the nation’s 500.000 Christians. Conflict and polarisation help democratic societies to rise to future challenges. A case in point are Christians which diverge from mainstream societies thereby provoking conflict and eventually change. The so called Peaceful Revolution in the German Democratic Republic provides a historic example of a conflict which paved the way for reforms. At that time the Nikolai Church in Leipzig was the focal point of protests against the regime. In fact, this very church became the birthplace of a movement which culminated 1989 in the German “Wende”. In functioning democracies citizens delegate the negotiation of their discrepancies to their parliaments and panels. Polarisation thus forces politicians to solve problems and keep parties competitive.
Values and Conflicts
Diverging positions of ideological fractions seem less and less compatible while the number of moderate-minded Germans dwindles. Conflicts are exacerbated by systemic aberrations which undermine Germany’s commonwealth and need to be readjusted. There is a widespread fear that disenchantment with the political elites, growing (verbal) violence and shrinking cooperation among voters may endanger our political stability. Christian communities are pulled into this divisive vortex along with everybody else, therefore let's take a closer look at current developments. Rather than unproven allegations readily repeated by the media, we need solid facts produced by scientific studies on conflict-related issues. In its 4/2021 issue, the quarterly journal "Konfliktdynamik" (Conflict Dynamics) provides an overview of the current state of scientific knowledge. A long-term project of the Hans Böckler Foundation is investigating the main causes of today's growing social dissonance. While most Germans still share common values, their priorities vary, and researchers have observed a marked shift towards a greater diversity of core ethics over the past 15 years. In 2021, only one in three Germans seem to put their religion or belief above other ethical codes, whereas in 2006, half of Germans put their faith first. Similarly, the commitment to a shared national narrative is shrinking, even though a strong majority of Germans agree with our society's commitment to the weak and vulnerable. So despite a shared moral code, our society is becoming more heterogeneous. This trend dismayed many Germans, as our national culture has traditionally sought a broad consensus. Economic issues, namely the distribution of wealth, are at the heart of many conflicts, especially after German reunification, when economic prosperity differed greatly between western and eastern regions. Since 1968, new controversial issues have emerged. Starting with pacifists, feminists and anti-nuclear activists, young Germans took their protest against mainstream politics to the streets. They were joined by environmentalists, LGBT+ activists, EU sceptics, anti-migration movements and protests against globalisation. The mega-project of a modern railway station called Stuttgart 21 gave rise to a new kind of protesters called "Wutbürger". These were no longer young rebels fighting against the establishment, but middle-aged and middle-class citizens who marched mainly, but not exclusively, because they were angry about decisions made by local authorities. Climate change and the Corona rules, as well as a failing health system and an understaffed education sector, are further sources of discontent. A growing number of voters are losing faith in their elected leaders and rejecting compromises negotiated between political parties. Worse still, there is widespread dissatisfaction with political responsiveness and accountability. Finally, many Germans feel left out and rely much less on their government to deal with their specific problems than they did 15 years ago.
Communication
Expanding conflicts caused by burgeoning heterogeneity divide today’s societies. This trend is egged on by digital media platforms. Algorithms promote polarised statements as they produce more attention among users. Thus it became feasible for politicians to use provocative and partisan language, in virtual as well as in analogous dialogues. As political scientists Abramowitz and Saunders found out, well-educated and politically informed citizens tend to be more polarised than their less versed and engaged compatriots. Unfortunately, a personal and rude style of communication between elites polarises a society. Support for a political party turns into loyalty which it’s flagship personalities, whose instigating digital utterances are linked to their follower’s identity. Politically unilateral and unbalanced channels and platforms become the main source of information, which leads ultimately to life in a bubble, where only likeminded members exchange (unverified) arguments. Discussions get emotional without respect for diverging positons whose proponents become ‘the enemy’. Trust between different communities gets lost which makes societies susceptible for political opportunists. Such demagogues use their national and international influence to mobilise their followers by using crude WE against THEM narratives. Existing similarities are played down while differences are blown out of proportion. At worst the rejection of opposing parties, as well as their leaders and supporters influences the decision of voters stronger than the wish to support their own political fraction and their agenda. Fractions of radicalised citizens grow at the expense of moderate voters which are willing to compromise. Established mechanisms for the solving of conflicts fail and in the end nations like the United States are paralysed by repeated standoffs of their main political forces.
From conflict to cooperation
Wikipedia provides a best practice model of how to handle controversies smoothly. Everyone may write an article but they must cooperate with other editors, as the online encyclopaedia allows only one article per topic. This way even polarised editors need to solve their discrepancies if they want to create an article. Wikipedia lays out rules like an obligation to take a neutral stand and to back up claims with reliable sources. Debates trend to be longer, more competitive and more constructive if opposing viewpoints are expressed by equally strong parties. Eventually contributions written by ideologically diverse collectives are of higher quality and accuracy than those created by homogenous teams.
Many companies struggle with polarisation too, when balancing economic, social and environmental agendas. Particularly in humanitarian or ecological oriented organisations conflicts arise when their goals need to be aligned with economic viability. How can an institution combine opposing value concepts of their staff without appearing hypocritical or losing their credibility? In order to clarify how businesses, handle their worker’s contradictory goals effectively, economic expert Ali Aslan Gümüsay focused on religiously affiliated companies. At best managers motivate employees with contrary persuasions to collaborate without passing over a group permanently. Rather, a sustainable strategy confirms each employee’s attitude, no matter how contradictory. In order to achieve this, they may use ambivalent symbols and logos for their brands profile. Also they may create literally and figuratively distinct spaces for secular and religious employees. Gümsay argues that religion may causes conflicts, if beliefs are ignored, that is because each individuals creed is personal but not private. Consequently, silencing opposing world views may backfire into a full blown conflict. A case in point is cancel culture, which discredits positions diverging from mainstream ethics, shouts down debates and ostracises proponents with diverging views. If societies accept ambiguity they are able to handle conflicting goals of their members instead of trying to avoid any dissent. The result is an ambiguous unity, a time honoured concept, which Germans put into practise when they created a federal republic which balances regional and national interests. Still ambiguity is a challenging managing concept, which can’t be achieved by simply using a vague or euphemistic language. Such tactics undermines the credibility of any authority. Instead leaders and citizen alike must learn to cope with a complex and multipolar society. Or as the bible has it:
By pride comes nothing but strife, but with the well-advised is wisdom (Proverbs 13,10)
​
Sources:
​
Abramowitz, A. S. (2008). Is Polarization a Myth? The Journal of Politics, pp. 70:2, pp. 542-555
Gümüsay, A. (2021). Einheit in Vielfalt: Führung, Organisation und Konfliktmanagment. Konfliktdynamik, pp. 4, pp 290-294.
Hilmer, R. M.-H. (2021). Migrations-, Klima- und Corona-Politik. Konfliktdynamik, pp. Jahrggang 10 (4) seiten 253-262.
Itten, A. (2021). Über die Koexistenz von Polariierung und Kooperation. Konfliktdynamik, pp. Jahrgang 10 (4) Seiten 263-271.
Levendusky, M. (2018). Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization? The Journal of Politics, pp. Issue 1, pp 59-70.
Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Norris, P. (2021, August). Cancel Culture: Myth or Reality? Political Studies, p. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211037023.
Redlich, A. S. (2021 ). Einführung zum Schwerpunktthema "Gesellschaftliche Polarisierung". Konfliktdynamik, pp. Jahrgang 10 (4) Seite 250-252.
Schimmang, J. (2020, November 2020). Spaltung der Gesellschaft? Versuch einer Begriffsklärung. Retrieved from Heinrich Böll Stiftung: https://www.boell.de/de/2020/11/19/spaltung-der-gesellschaft-versuch-einer-begriffsklaerung
Shi et al. (2019). The wisdom of polarized crowds. Nature Human Behaviour, pp. Issue 3, pages 329–336 . Retrieved from Nature Human Behaviour.
Stadt Leipzig. (2022). Nikolaikirche, Ausgangspunkt der Friedlichen Revolution. Retrieved from Stadt Leipzig: https://www.leipzig.de/buergerservice-und-verwaltung/unsere-stadt/stadtgeschichte/historisches-aus-1000-jahren/nikolaikirche-ausgangspunkt-der-friedlichen-revolution/#:~:text=Die%20Nikolaikirche%20Leipzig%20ist%201989%20zum%20Symbol%20der,im%20Sprachgebra
​
Final exam report for the online course Journalism at the Freie Journalistenschule
The Return of the Beasts
EU-Conservation projects combine pragmatism with visionary concepts
Grazing Przewalski Horses in Augsburg's Stadtwald (photo by Elisabeth Brandt)
​
In southern Germany's Augsburg, ice age is only a short walk away. The adjoining Königsbrunner Stadtwald
remained unchanged for thousands of years. Since 2007 visitors may even encounter archaic Przewalski horses. This light-flooded pine forest is also home to a variety of plants ranging from Mediterranean Marsh Gladiolus to rare vegetation left over from the last ice age, a veritable biodiversity hotspot. Grazing, first by wild beasts then by cattle prevented the encroachment of shrubs, thus herds of herbivores preserved a mosaic landscape of wooded areas and pastures. Unfortunately, in today’s Europe this kind of extensive farming is hardly viable, as marginal agriculture on poor soils yields only meagre profits. Sadly, this is also true for alpine landscapes where sloping grounds and stony soils hamper the use of pastures on high altitudes. Industrialised farming combined with urbanisation and demographic changes lead to depopulated landscapes all over Europe. Since 1960 the continent’s rural population shrunk by 70%. Trends were exacerbated when EU reformed her premium policy. Since 2003, farmers receive bonuses according to their floor space instead of their produce. Especially mobile shepherds lost thus vital income as they rarely own land.
Limited freedom
Sustainable land management by grazing created unique landscapes like alpine pastures or north German heathlands, now essential habitats for endangered species and tourist attractions in rural regions. Equally military areas became precious refuges for vulnerable species. Alas, many training grounds like Bavarian Tennenlohe, formerly used by the United States army and unproductive fields and pastures are no longer in use. Consequently, these spaces need some kind of weed control to keep encroaching shrubs in check. In order to prevent the overgrowing of marginal terrains the EU promotes grazing projects. A term which refers to the practise to herd unmanaged land with frugal herbivores. Apart from sheep or goats, cattle and horses are deployed. If possible wild species are rewilded, but unfortunately Auerochs and primeval wild horses have gone extinct. Luckily European Bisons survived in captivity and have been rewilded since1952. Now 34 herds of the majestic bovines roam again through Europe’s wildernesses. If wild forms are not available, resilient historical breeds like Przewalski horses, ponies or Scottish Highland Cattle are used. Even Heckrind a kind of pseudo-Auerochs, ‘re-bred’ by mixing old breeds of domesticated cattle are put on pastures. Rewilded breeds need to be able to look after themselves, at most they will get extra food during hard winters. Thus robust herbivores graze in abandoned landscapes, a cost effective and low maintenance way to preserve precious biotopes. Plant preferences differ among species, consequently they create distinct micro-habitats, a prerequisite for high biodiversity. Also grazing animals love to rub their itching hide at shrubs and in hard times they substitute their meagre diet by browsing bushes. This way they keep landscapes open more effectively than deer. By rolling on the ground and trampling down vegetation herbivores create small patches of open ground which become habitats and germinating pockets for many species. Plants can disperse by being eaten by herbivores, whose faeces also fertilises the soil and provides breeding ground for insects. Admittedly most rewilded herds are confined to large but fenced territories. Thus Königsbrunns’s Przewalski horses are restricted to a 27 ha area. Megafauna in unfenced habitats becomes easily a bone of contention. A case in point are eight Bisons set free 2013 in the private estate of Prince zu Sayn-Wittgenstein in the Westphalian Rothaargebirge. Since their arrival they multiplied to 25 individuals which reshaped their new home range, much to the dismay of Forest owners whose commercially managed forests border the estate. Today this rewilding project is threatened by legal actions from neighbouring landowners and surrounding communities.
Pleistocene Europe
Rewilding Europe, a foundation set up in 2011, has a more comprehensive vision for Europe’s new wastelands. Their project -called Pleistocene Rewilding- aims at the (re)creation of glacial ecosystems by introducing megafauna into deserted areas. Rewilding Europe casts about for large territories whose ecological outfit predisposes them for the rebirth of Pleistocene biospheres. Pleistocene designates the geological era which lasted till the end of the last glacial. Local agents campaigning for the conservation of the areas wildlife are another crucial prerequisite for Rewilding Europe’s involvement. The Foundation encourages conservation activists, crosslinks organisations and if necessary provides animals for rewilding. This way Rewilding Europe initiated 2015 a project in north eastern Germany’s Oder-Delta a key conservation zone and resting place or migrating birds. Peter Torkler, project manager of Rewilding Oder-Delta lays out his organisation’s philosophy: “Rewilding tries to scale back human involvement as far as possible in order to establish a natural dynamic. Then we step back.” Today herds of European Bisons and wild horses wander through the deltas vast territory. Their 250.000 ha homerange is truly boundless as it spreads on both sides of the German-Polish border. Torkler values the engagement of Polish nature conservationists and considers polish nature “more intact”. While in Germany more finances are available for environmental protection, there is less acceptance for rewilding projects than in Poland. Critics of Rewilding Europe argue, that after 10.000 years of post-glacial cultivation there is not enough space for large animals in our densely populated nations. Torkler counters, that there will be no active release of wild animals into the Oder-Delta, instead Bisons, horses and other creatures trickle in from Poland. If a fence, recently erected and cutting through the region, will stunt wildlife-migration is yet unknown. The barrier is to prevent the immigration of wild boars infected with African swine fever. Rewilding Oder-Delta’s concept also impacts the local economy by luring visitors into the stunning but economically underdeveloped region. To promote businesses and enable them to profit from newly created nature-tourism Rewilding Europe partnered with the regional government of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Similarly, the EU set up a project called Wildlife Economy (WLE) designed to invest into the economic development of poor rural regions like the Oder-Delta.
Predators
Self-regulating ecosystems need predators, as herbivores will damage forests and cause erosion if they overpopulate their habitats. The Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe (LCIE) campaigns for the reintroduction of bears, wolves and lynxes to control large herds. LCIE sparks heated controversies as huge carnivores evoke long forgotten fears and need large territories for their survival. When, at the dawn of the new millennium, wolves returned to Germany they spread therefore fast. Twenty years later more than thousand individuals live in the Bundesrepublik, some of them wandering alone or in pairs, others established themselves permanently in 128 packs. None of them has been introduced, instead they crossed Germany’s eastern borders or the Alps. The wolves’ fast and successful reintegration into central Europe’s ecosystems demonstrate their ability to share their habitats with man. Will humans be equally versatile? Since 1992 wolves are protected by the EU’s Fauna-Flora-Habitat-Directive. Combined with the fall of the iron curtain this enabled them to reclaim their old hunting grounds all over central and western Europe. Alas, residents have yet to accept the grey hunter’s presence, if it is to stay permanently. Eastern and south eastern Europeans may serve as a role model, wolves never got extinct in their countries and citizens stayed used to them. Further west wildlife has been controlled by hunters since wolves became extinct in the 19th century. Recently huntsmen shouldered also the monitoring of wolves, by registering their tracks and appearances. Essential information for conservationists and forestry departments. Foresters and huntsmen need to adjust their shooting quota by taking into account the numbers of deer killed by wolves. Prey gets more timorous and it becomes more difficult for hunters to detect them. Some species like endangered mouflons are pushed further towards extinction by the reappearance of additional predators like wolves. While hunting associations welcome the return of the wolf they regard him as sufficiently established to loosen conservation directives and allow licenced killings. Their argument: Controlled hunting of wolves ensures that they stay wary of humans and keep their distance. 2020 the government of Niedersachsen decided to include wolves into the region’s hunting law. Local politicians called this a ‘signal’, albeit an inconsequential one, as under EU and federal law wolves remain strictly protected even in Niedersachsen.
Wolves among sheep
It comes as no surprise that livestock farmers are wolf-sceptics. Only 1% of German wolves’ diet consists of domesticated animals, they mostly hunt deer, mouflon and wild boars. Nonetheless the wolves’ return puts pressure on cattle holders and above all on shepherds as 89% of all utilitarian animals killed by wolves are sheep. In addition, wolves attack horses and young cattle. The latter are especially vulnerable in alpine regions, because their high-altitude pastures are hard to secure against wolves due to the rocky ground and their remoteness. Ravines may destroy electronic wolf-proof fences during the winter while trekker and biker complain about irritating obstacles in summer. To support its alpine farmers Bavaria considers to establish wolf-free zones, one more local voice contradicting EU’s FFH-directive. The Association Wildtierschutz in Deutschland e.v. (Protection of Wildlife in Germany) objects to the complete banishment of wolves from certain areas, as young wolves in search of a new home range must be able to move freely. Counterintuitively, Romania, a country with a stable wolf-population, also hosts Europe’s third-largest population of sheep. Romania’s hard-pressed shepherds employ herding dogs to protect their livestock. Unlike collies herding dogs are huge beasts, apart from assisting shepherds in moving their flocks they deter and fight wolves. Herding dogs are expensive as each shepherd needs several of the imposing canines to protect his animals and their acquisition, training and upkeep cost several thousand Euros per year and dog. Also poorly trained dogs may prove to be a grave threat for unsuspecting tourists.
Thrown to the wolves?
Everybody heard the tale of Red riding hood and similar hair rising stories about big, bad wolves. Thus, from an early age we are infused with a fear of wolves, but how much of a threat for humans are the grey carnivores actually? To ascertain to what extent wolves injure or kill humans a Norwegian group of scientists conducted in 2002 a global survey which included contemporary and well documented historical incidents. Members of the international team came from all backgrounds and included some leading heads of the LCIE. Most wolves attacking humans were rabid, therefore the number of assaults by wolves in Europe dipped dramatically after the decline of rabies infections during the 20th century. Since 1950 wolves injured nine Europeans five of the aggressors were rabid. Sometimes wolves hurt humans if they are attacked by them for example when shepherds try to defend their flock. Only when wolves lose their instinctive fear of humans they regard them as prey and especially children may become their victims. In India where 273 children were killed from 1980 to 2000 by wolves. After the canine’s natural prey became rare, they scavenged junk yards where they came into close contact with children and got fatally habituated to them. The study concludes that wolves attack humans rarely as long as they find enough food elsewhere and don’t become accustomed to them. At the other hand big carnivores like wolves play a key part in their ecosystems dynamic, for example by controlling local wildlife. Currently forestry agencies work hard to transform European woods to in order to increase their resilience against the effects of global warming. Unfortunately, their efforts are frustrated by local wildlife, because our forests are overpopulated and young trees struggle to survive among hordes of hungry deer. After the re-introduction of wolves into the Yellowstone Park, they increased local biodiversity by reducing herbivores, thereby overgrazed vegetation could recover.
Action Plans
Courtesy to conservation efforts and the reintroduction of large mammals, Pleistocene megafauna returnes to central and western Europe. To make this a success-story the majority of Europeans needs to embrace the re-emergence of primeval wildlife and regard rewilded landscapes as an enrichment of their regions. To this end, the European Union commissioned a team of LCIE experts and other scientists to work out a concept for the management of large predators. This panel suggests a EU-wide framework of conservation rules which are flexible enough to give regional administrations some leeway. Thus local circumstances and resident’s concerns can be taken into account. Since 2019 Germany compensates livestock holders for damages caused by wolf-attacks and pays for protective measures, fulfilling thereby an EU directive. Sadly, destruction caused by other large mammals such as Elks will not be recompensed. Four years ago Bavaria also started it's very own ‘Action Plan Wolf’ which includes a survey of the Bundesland’s districts. Based on this study Bavaria’s government will remove wolves from areas where is not feasible to protect livestock. Also in 2019, Germany’s parliament the Deutsche Bundestag decided to facilitate the killing of wolves. Bavaria’s Landwirtschaftsministerin (responsible for Bavaria’s agriculture) Michaela Kaniber asks for an EU wide assessment of the wolfe’s distribution. If the grey hunter’s population turns out to be large and stable, protective measures should be relaxed. Kaniber wants to cap the number of wolves allowed in each region in order to avoid overpopulation. Already wolves which behave odd will be watched to prevent attacks. Conspicuous individuals may be equipped with a transmitter, scared off or even be destroyed. At the other hand the European Union wants to create a network of protected areas which are connected by safe corridors. Thus scattered populations of plants and animals can exchange genes. Animals can migrate and establish new territories. On a smaller scale wildlife crossings ensure that isolated wildlife populations can mix despite Europe’s dense infrastructure which knifes through many natural habitats. Crucial for the re-establishment of primeval wildlife are initiatives which inform and educate residents in order to alleviate their fears and show them how to avoid critical encounters. West-Europeans should learn from their eastern and southern neighbours, which look back on a long co-existence with large creatures like wolves, Bisons, Elks and bears. In Poland wandering Bisons are equipped with transmitters to control their movements. During winters they get additional food, this way they stay within their natural reserve. Economic programs promote local industries which profit from eco-tourism attracted by a region’s beauty and rich wildlife. Thus new possibilities will hopefully make megafauna palatable to humans, especially in environments with a rich wildlife but a poor economy.
On a frosty winter day, a herd of Przewalski Horses grazes on a clearing in Augsburg's Stadtwald. A scene which evokes stone-age cave paintings. Yet every one of them has been born in captivity and had to learn how to survive in the wild. At the same time, the horses trigger biological processes which restore some of the forests natural dynamic.